N-95 Masks - FACT CHECK

Yep!  I'm in a family that still wears masks when in large, over-populated areas indoors.  People look at us and judge us with a squint of their eyes, a shake of their heads, or a deep frown.  

What do you care if I wear a mask?  Does it alter your state of being?  Or does it actually frighten you?  Does it make you question your own choices?  

As I have written previously, I come from a military family.  My family was assigned to and/or visited over 10 military bases in my life.  In these times, I have always respected the Asians that I saw on military bases over the years, walking around, working, and shopping with their masks on during flu season or when they were feeling under the weather.  However, growing up, on those military bases, I was just a kid, and I did not know where to get the masks.  You see, my family did not do the mask thing growing up.  I found it intriguing and insightful, though.

With COVID, I now have a surplus of masks and insertable filters.  I see no reason to stop wearing them in tight places, especially during flu season.  There have been people who have come up to me and aggressively let me know their opinion that masks don't work.  I simply respond..."tell that to hundreds of thousands of doctors across the world who have been wearing them for hundreds of years".  To learn more about who is right about mask-wearing, see the three links below.  You can also read the FACT CHECK article posted below.

1. USA Today HERE 2020
2. PolitiCheck HERE 2020
3. News Network (Mayo Clinic) HERE 2020

I do not own this article.  To help educate yourself on the worldly news in a balanced way, join the Epoch Times. I recommend that if you are looking for balanced reporting, be sure to purchase your own membership of the Epoch Times! The content below is from USA Today.  Not always reliable--unless they are truly researching fact checks.

The claim: "N95 masks block few, if any" COVID-19 particles due to their size

As many states and communities ease restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the debate over mask usage has intensified.

Businesses, churches and governments have implemented all manner of policies — some requiring masks, some leaving it up to each person, some even banning masks. And that has spurred many armchair epidemiologists to weigh in, including a Facebook page with nearly 1 million followers.

A June 4 post from Why don’t you try this? went a step beyond the homemade mask debate to claim that even the N95 masks used by health care workers are pointless in the face of COVID-19.

“COVID 19 virus particle size is 125 nanometers (0.125 microns); the range is 0.06 microns to .14 microns,” the post said. “The N95 mask filters down to 0.3 microns. So, N95 masks block few, if any, virions (virus particles).”

In other words, the post asserts the virus is smaller than the filter on the N95 mask, so the N95 mask doesn’t work.

Experts say this claim flies in the face of numerous studies and reflects a failure to grasp fundamental principles of how viruses behave and how face masks work.

Here’s what we found.

Virus particles don’t exist alone

The science of mask functionality gets really small, really fast. The unit of measurement here is microns — 1/1000th of a millimeter.

The size-based argument against N95 laid out in this claim assumes mask filtering works something like water flowing through a net — particles in the water smaller than the net opening pass through, while larger items don’t.

But the physics involved don’t work like that at all.

The COVID-19 particle is indeed around 0.1 microns in size, but it is always bonded to something larger.

“There is never a naked virus floating in the air or released by people,” said Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who specializes in airborne transmission of viruses.

The virus attaches to water droplets or aerosols (i.e. really small droplets) that are generated by breathing, talking, coughing, etc. These consist of water, mucus protein and other biological material and are all larger than 1 micron.

“Breathing and talking generate particles around 1 micron in size, which will be collected by N95 respirator filters with very high efficiency,” said Lisa Brosseau, a retired professor of environmental and occupational health sciences who spent her career researching respiratory protection.

Health care precautions for COVID-19 are built around stopping the droplets, since “there’s not a lot of evidence for aerosol spread of COVID-19,” said Patrick Remington, a former CDC epidemiologist and director of the Preventive Medicine Residency Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Fact check: What's true and what's false about coronavirus?

Size matters, but not how you think

But that’s not the only logical flaw in this claim.

The N95 filter indeed is physically around the 0.3 micron size. But that doesn’t mean it can only stop particles larger than that. The masks are actually best for particles either larger or smaller than that 0.3 micron threshold.

“N95 have the worst filtration efficiency for particles around 0.3,” Marr said. “If you’re smaller than that those are actually collected even better. It’s counterintuitive because masks do not work like sieving out larger particles. It’s not like pasta in a colander, and small ones don’t get through.”

N95 masks actually have that name because they are 95% efficient at stopping particles in their least efficient particle size range — in this case those around 0.3 microns.

Why do they work better for smaller ones? There are a number of factors at play, but here are two main ones noted by experts:

The first is something called “Brownian motion,” the name given to a physical phenomenon in which particles smaller than 0.3 microns move in an erratic, zig-zagging kind of motion. This motion greatly increases the chance they will be snared by the mask fibers.

Secondly, the N95 mask itself uses electrostatic absorption, meaning particles are drawn to the fiber and trapped, instead of just passing through.

“Although these particles are smaller than the pores, they can be pulled over by the charged fibers and get stuck,” said Professor Jiaxing Huang, a materials scientist at Northwestern University working to develop a new type of medical face mask. “When the charges are dissipated during usage or storage, the capability of stopping virus-sized particles diminishes. This is the main reason of not recommending the reuse of N95 masks.”

Our ruling: False

We rate this claim FALSE because it is not supported by our research. The COVID-19 virus itself is indeed smaller than the N95 filter size, but the virus always travels attached to larger particles that are consistently snared by the filter. And even if the particles were smaller than the N95 filter size, the erratic motion of particles that size and the electrostatic attraction generated by the mask means they would be consistently caught as well.

Our fact-check sources:

• Interview with Patrick Remington, former CDC epidemiologist and director of the Preventive Medicine Residency Program at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, June 9, 2020
• Interview with Linsey Marr, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, June 9, 2020
• Email exchange with Lisa Brosseau, retired professor of environmental and occupational health sciences, June 9, 2020
• Email exchange with Jiaxing Huang, materials scientist at Northwestern University, June 9, 2020
• Email exchange with Bill Hanage, associate professor of epidemiology at Harvard University’s School of Public Health, June 9, 2020
• Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data, April 1, 2020
• Email exchange with Nancy Leung, post-doctoral researcher in infectious disease epidemiology at the University of Hong Kong, June 9, 2020
• Email exchange with Yang Wang, assistant professor of civil, architectural and environmental engineering at the Missouri University of Science and Technology, June 9, 2020

Want to Learn More: FACT CHECKS

Fact check: COVID-19 can cause worse lung damage than smokingFact check: COVID-19 vaccine has been nearly 20 years in the makingFact check: Not likely that COVID-19 vaccine was cause of Hank Aaron's deathFact check: What's true about COVID-19, its vaccine, face masks and seasonal flu?